<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 proprietary alternatives that are just better.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/</link>
	<description>Hitching a ride on the information superhighway.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apidexin</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-26149</link>
		<dc:creator>Apidexin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-26149</guid>
		<description>apidexin for $39.99</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apidexin for $39.99</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: system optimizer</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-20178</link>
		<dc:creator>system optimizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-20178</guid>
		<description>Mac is actually attaining actually as well as increasing number of consumers. In fact the part Macintosh computer entrepreneurs reached close to 20% of final amount of US notebook computer owners. Without a doubt a great job for a company once nearly removed from computer market. However the issue is always that increase in number of Macintosh end users is a good reason for the actual quick boost from the variety of software designed for Macs personal computer system. To select amongst these sensibly you need to proceed through and focus carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac is actually attaining actually as well as increasing number of consumers. In fact the part Macintosh computer entrepreneurs reached close to 20% of final amount of US notebook computer owners. Without a doubt a great job for a company once nearly removed from computer market. However the issue is always that increase in number of Macintosh end users is a good reason for the actual quick boost from the variety of software designed for Macs personal computer system. To select amongst these sensibly you need to proceed through and focus carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teacup</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Teacup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>Suggestion : 
Video/Edit - Vegas Video 
- Light, stable 
- Support many practical audio/video codecs
- Only 110 dollars 
- Quick to learn
- Dragg and drop feature
- Zounds of effects 
- Etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion :<br />
Video/Edit &#8211; Vegas Video<br />
- Light, stable<br />
- Support many practical audio/video codecs<br />
- Only 110 dollars<br />
- Quick to learn<br />
- Dragg and drop feature<br />
- Zounds of effects<br />
- Etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haley</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Haley...&lt;/strong&gt;

awesome blog keep updating and you will see us comming back and back....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Haley&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>awesome blog keep updating and you will see us comming back and back&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>As far as I am concerned, iTunes is horrible. Thrice I have tried it, each time on a different machine. It has yet to actually work without causing noticable lag on my machine. Personally, I play everything in VLC - sure it may not have the best interface, but that thing will play just about any media file you have.

As far as text files go: wordpad/write in Windows, and vi in *NIX.

On the topic of ease of use, I&#039;d say you haven&#039;t given Ubuntu a proper run. I loved it because the live CD not only let me try the system, but allowed me to use and configure the system while still installing it. It means I didn&#039;t have to wait out the installer before I got right into using it.

On the matter of Office suites, Microsoft Office if it is already installed, OpenOffice otherwise, simply because I&#039;m too lazy to dig out my Office install disk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am concerned, iTunes is horrible. Thrice I have tried it, each time on a different machine. It has yet to actually work without causing noticable lag on my machine. Personally, I play everything in VLC &#8211; sure it may not have the best interface, but that thing will play just about any media file you have.</p>
<p>As far as text files go: wordpad/write in Windows, and vi in *NIX.</p>
<p>On the topic of ease of use, I&#8217;d say you haven&#8217;t given Ubuntu a proper run. I loved it because the live CD not only let me try the system, but allowed me to use and configure the system while still installing it. It means I didn&#8217;t have to wait out the installer before I got right into using it.</p>
<p>On the matter of Office suites, Microsoft Office if it is already installed, OpenOffice otherwise, simply because I&#8217;m too lazy to dig out my Office install disk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 10:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not entirely clear what point you&#039;re trying to make. I use open source and commerical software, as do many other developers I know, but my choices differ from yours.  Here&#039;s some:

2) Who&#039;s the developer? You or your mother? For development, Linux is a much better platform, and, like you, I could write a separate article about this. Read this: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html

3) Ever heard of commerical SlickEdit? Runs on your buddy Windows and *Nix. Bragging about a product that has a built in keystroke to compile a Java source file is an odd argument.

5) Get your facts right. Open office is not written in Java, and the fact that you think it is shows that you don&#039;t know a lot about open source. Most open source groups didn&#039;t look too kindly on Java until  Sun open sourced the JDK. They certainly would  not have promoted an office suite written in Java. On the point of usability, I use Open Office at home and use MS Office at work under duress. I&#039;m happy with OO as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not entirely clear what point you&#8217;re trying to make. I use open source and commerical software, as do many other developers I know, but my choices differ from yours.  Here&#8217;s some:</p>
<p>2) Who&#8217;s the developer? You or your mother? For development, Linux is a much better platform, and, like you, I could write a separate article about this. Read this: <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html</a></p>
<p>3) Ever heard of commerical SlickEdit? Runs on your buddy Windows and *Nix. Bragging about a product that has a built in keystroke to compile a Java source file is an odd argument.</p>
<p>5) Get your facts right. Open office is not written in Java, and the fact that you think it is shows that you don&#8217;t know a lot about open source. Most open source groups didn&#8217;t look too kindly on Java until  Sun open sourced the JDK. They certainly would  not have promoted an office suite written in Java. On the point of usability, I use Open Office at home and use MS Office at work under duress. I&#8217;m happy with OO as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jee</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Oracle - ugh!

The only product the company makes that is even reasonably acceptable is the RDB and that is an overcomplicated monster that takes far more trouble than it is worth to keep running.  If you really need it&#039;s power, then you might be stuck with it.  For 99% of the rest of us, DB2, PostgreSQL, SqlServer, MySql, probably even Derby are better choices.  I don&#039;t hate Oracle as a company, but I *HATE* their products.

Oracle Portal - absolute garbage
Oracle AS - functional, but not nearly as good as WebLogic
TopLink - can&#039;t even compare to Hibernate
JDeveloper - bloated mess.  NetBeans is *so* much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle &#8211; ugh!</p>
<p>The only product the company makes that is even reasonably acceptable is the RDB and that is an overcomplicated monster that takes far more trouble than it is worth to keep running.  If you really need it&#8217;s power, then you might be stuck with it.  For 99% of the rest of us, DB2, PostgreSQL, SqlServer, MySql, probably even Derby are better choices.  I don&#8217;t hate Oracle as a company, but I *HATE* their products.</p>
<p>Oracle Portal &#8211; absolute garbage<br />
Oracle AS &#8211; functional, but not nearly as good as WebLogic<br />
TopLink &#8211; can&#8217;t even compare to Hibernate<br />
JDeveloper &#8211; bloated mess.  NetBeans is *so* much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woofster</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Woofster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I could write list called &quot;Five people that are better than five other people&quot; and it would have as much validity. I mean, kudos for your opinion, man, and if this works for you then rock on, but this is purely subjective. You don&#039;t even define what &quot;just better&quot; means.

Windows? I&#039;ve got five boxes running Ubuntu. To hell with Windows&#039; lack of a reasonable command line, binary bias, cruft-gathering registry, idiotic update &quot;validation&quot; utilties, once-yearly (if you&#039;re lucky) service packs ... ugh. Yes, there are some things Windows does extremely well. But &quot;just better&quot; than *nix? I wouldn&#039;t even know what you mean.

Textpad? I realize that text editors are a religious choice among programmers, but, dude ... Textpad? Among its &quot;features&quot; are listed, &quot;It can handle file sizes up to the limits of virtual memory&quot; and &quot;Text can be in either the ANSI (Windows) or OEM (DOS) code sets&quot;. Whoop-de-freakin&#039;-do. I&#039;ve used Textpad and, I&#039;m not sorry to say bud, but you and I get into a debate on the merits of Textpad vs., oh, Vim, and the only point you&#039;re going to have is learning curve issues. After that, I win every point. Every one. All of them. All the points. You lose. I win.

Of your other choices the only one I can unqualifyingly agree with is iTunes, which delivers a set of highly desirable proprietary services. Trillian *is* great software and I also like Microsoft Office, but you&#039;d need to define your criteria for &quot;better&quot; before I&#039;d absolutely agree. Otherwise you&#039;re not saying anything meaningful beyond, hey, &quot;I like these!&quot;

Okay. Hey. I like chocolate ice cream. It&#039;s the best of all the other flavors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could write list called &#8220;Five people that are better than five other people&#8221; and it would have as much validity. I mean, kudos for your opinion, man, and if this works for you then rock on, but this is purely subjective. You don&#8217;t even define what &#8220;just better&#8221; means.</p>
<p>Windows? I&#8217;ve got five boxes running Ubuntu. To hell with Windows&#8217; lack of a reasonable command line, binary bias, cruft-gathering registry, idiotic update &#8220;validation&#8221; utilties, once-yearly (if you&#8217;re lucky) service packs &#8230; ugh. Yes, there are some things Windows does extremely well. But &#8220;just better&#8221; than *nix? I wouldn&#8217;t even know what you mean.</p>
<p>Textpad? I realize that text editors are a religious choice among programmers, but, dude &#8230; Textpad? Among its &#8220;features&#8221; are listed, &#8220;It can handle file sizes up to the limits of virtual memory&#8221; and &#8220;Text can be in either the ANSI (Windows) or OEM (DOS) code sets&#8221;. Whoop-de-freakin&#8217;-do. I&#8217;ve used Textpad and, I&#8217;m not sorry to say bud, but you and I get into a debate on the merits of Textpad vs., oh, Vim, and the only point you&#8217;re going to have is learning curve issues. After that, I win every point. Every one. All of them. All the points. You lose. I win.</p>
<p>Of your other choices the only one I can unqualifyingly agree with is iTunes, which delivers a set of highly desirable proprietary services. Trillian *is* great software and I also like Microsoft Office, but you&#8217;d need to define your criteria for &#8220;better&#8221; before I&#8217;d absolutely agree. Otherwise you&#8217;re not saying anything meaningful beyond, hey, &#8220;I like these!&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay. Hey. I like chocolate ice cream. It&#8217;s the best of all the other flavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Please stop spreading the rumors that OpenOffice.Org is written in Java (it&#039;s not). I&#039;m a big Java fan, especially since it pays my bills, but let&#039;s be accurate here. There are some optional components of oOo that use Java (specifically the database), but the core system is C++. Even these components are native compiled on modern linux distros using gcj.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop spreading the rumors that OpenOffice.Org is written in Java (it&#8217;s not). I&#8217;m a big Java fan, especially since it pays my bills, but let&#8217;s be accurate here. There are some optional components of oOo that use Java (specifically the database), but the core system is C++. Even these components are native compiled on modern linux distros using gcj.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diogo</title>
		<link>http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>diogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.callingshotgun.net/geekery/5-proprietary-alternatives-that-are-just-better/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re list is accurate, very so. The only additions i can think of are the creation tools (Photoshop, Illustrator, PageMaker, Quark, sound tools, video editing...). There really aren&#039;t as good free solutions to these problems.

However, free software is mostly aimed at developers, sys admins, people who actually know a thing or two about computer in general. And in that it excels. 

But for creation/design, its not even close (yes, Gimp sucks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re list is accurate, very so. The only additions i can think of are the creation tools (Photoshop, Illustrator, PageMaker, Quark, sound tools, video editing&#8230;). There really aren&#8217;t as good free solutions to these problems.</p>
<p>However, free software is mostly aimed at developers, sys admins, people who actually know a thing or two about computer in general. And in that it excels. </p>
<p>But for creation/design, its not even close (yes, Gimp sucks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

